壳聚糖:一种应用在三维骨组织工程中的生物活性支架材料
作者:
中图分类号:

Q

基金项目:

国家重点研发计划项目(2021YFA0719303);国家自然科学基金项目(32271166, 32100572);广东省基础与应用基础研究基金项目(2024A1515013017);深圳市科技计划项目(JCYJ20200109115441918, KCXFZ2020122113400002, JCYJ20210324102013035, JCYJ20210324123610028)


Chitosan: A Scaffold Biomaterial in 3D Bone Tissue Engineering and Its Biological Activities
Author:
Fund Project:

National Key Research and Development Program of China (2021YFA0719303), National Natural Science Foundation of China (32271166, 32100572), Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation (2024A1515013017), Shenzhen Science and Technology Program (JCYJ20200109115441918, KCXFZ2020122113400002, JCYJ20210324102013035, JCYJ20210324123610028)

  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [97]
  • |
  • 相似文献 [20]
  • | | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    通过制造支架来模拟人体微环境是生物医学领域的一大成就。然而,寻找理想生物支架的工作仍处于起步阶段,需要克服重大挑战。目前,科学研究更倾向于天然物质,因为它们具有极强的生物能力、低成本和生物可降解性,并且比合成实验室制造的产品毒性更小。壳聚糖是一种著名的多糖,因其生物活性而备受关注,尤其是在 3D 骨组织工程中。壳聚糖与天然组织非常相似,因此是生物打印的热门候选材料。本文重点分析了基于壳聚糖支架发展的潜力以及骨治疗的缺点。壳聚糖纳米复合材料具有较强的机械强度、吸水能力、细胞相互作用和生物降解特性。壳聚糖衍生物还提供了不同的治疗途径,并且具有较强的生物活性。 3D 定制生物打印为设计和制造具有生物、机械和地形特性的支架打开了新的大门。

    Abstract:

    The ability to replicate the microenvironment of the human body through the fabrication of scaffolds is a significant achievement in the biomedical field. However, the search for the ideal scaffold is still in its infancy and there are significant challenges to overcome. In the modern era, the scientific community is increasingly turned to natural substances due to their superior biological ability, lower cost, biodegradability, and lower toxicity than synthetic lab-made products. Chitosan is a well-known polysaccharide that has recently garnered a high amount of attention for its biological activities, especially in 3D bone tissue engineering. Chitosan closely matches the native tissues and thus stands out as a popular candidate for bioprinting. This review focuses on the potential of chitosan-based scaffolds for advancements and the drawbacks in bone treatment. Chitosan-based nanocomposites have exhibited strong mechanical strength, water-trapping ability, cellular interaction, and biodegradability. Chitosan derivatives have also encouraged and provided different routes for treatment and enhanced biological activities. 3D tailored bioprinting has opened new doors for designing and manufacturing scaffolds with biological, mechanical, and topographical properties.

    参考文献
    1. Saravanan, S., R. Leena, and N. Selvamurugan, Chitosan based biocomposite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. International journal of biological macromolecules, 2016. 93: p. 1354-1365.
    2. Safiri, S., et al., Global, regional, and national burden of other musculoskeletal disorders 1990–2017: Results from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Rheumatology, 2021. 60(2): p. 855-865.
    3. Udduttula, A., et al., Novel Sr5 (PO4) 2SiO4-graphene nanocomposites for applications in bone regeneration in vitro. Applied Surface Science, 2020. 507: p. 145176.
    4. Teng, B., et al., Cervical vertebrae for early bone loss evaluation in osteoporosis mouse models. Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery, 2023. 13(4): p. 2466.
    5. Murizan, N.I.S., et al., Review on nanocrystalline cellulose in bone tissue engineering applications. Polymers, 2020. 12(12): p. 2818.
    6. Sun, A.R., et al., Cartilage tissue engineering for obesity-induced osteoarthritis: Physiology, challenges, and future prospects. Journal of orthopaedic translation, 2021. 26: p. 3-15.
    7. Levengood, S.K.L. and M. Zhang, Chitosan-based scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Journal of Materials Chemistry B, 2014. 2(21): p. 3161-3184.
    8. Fourie, J., et al., Chitosan composite biomaterials for bone tissue engineering—a review. Regenerative Engineering and Translational Medicine, 2020: p. 1-21.
    9. Chen, Y., et al., A novel photocrosslinked phosphate functionalized Chitosan-Sr5 (PO4) 2SiO4 composite hydrogels and in vitro biomineralization, osteogenesis, angiogenesis for bone regeneration application. Composites Part B: Engineering, 2021. 222: p. 109057.
    10. Meskinfam, M., Polymer scaffolds for bone regeneration, in Characterization of Polymeric Biomaterials. 2017, Elsevier. p. 441-475.
    11. Muxika, A., et al., Chitosan as a bioactive polymer: Processing, properties and applications. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 2017. 105: p. 1358-1368.
    12. Philibert, T., B.H. Lee, and N. Fabien, Current status and new perspectives on chitin and chitosan as functional biopolymers. Applied biochemistry and biotechnology, 2017. 181(4): p. 1314-1337.
    13. Younes, I. and M. Rinaudo, Chitin and chitosan preparation from marine sources. Structure, properties and applications. Marine drugs, 2015. 13(3): p. 1133-1174.
    14. Lizardi-Mendoza, J., W.M.A. Monal, and F.M.G. Valencia, Chemical characteristics and functional properties of chitosan, in Chitosan in the preservation of agricultural commodities. 2016, Elsevier. p. 3-31.
    15. Miculescu, F., et al., Synthesis and characterization of jellified composites from bovine bone-derived hydroxyapatite and starch as precursors for robocasting. ACS omega, 2018. 3(1): p. 1338-1349.
    16. Wang, C., et al., Phenotypic expression of bone-related genes in osteoblasts grown on calcium phosphate ceramics with different phase compositions. Biomaterials, 2004. 25(13): p. 2507-2514.
    17. Khalaji, S., N. Golshan Ebrahimi, and H. Hosseinkhani, Enhancement of biocompatibility of PVA/HTCC blend polymer with collagen for skin care application. International Journal of Polymeric Materials and Polymeric Biomaterials, 2021. 70(7): p. 459-468.
    18. Yuan, N., K.S. Rezzadeh, and J.C. Lee, Biomimetic scaffolds for osteogenesis. Receptors clinical investigation, 2015. 2(3).
    19. Maturavongsadit, P., et al., Cell-Laden Nanocellulose/Chitosan-Based Bioinks for 3D Bioprinting and Enhanced Osteogenic Cell Differentiation. ACS Applied Bio Materials, 2021. 4(3): p. 2342-2353.
    20. Meskinfam, M., et al., Polyurethane foam/nano hydroxyapatite composite as a suitable scaffold for bone tissue regeneration. Materials Science and Engineering: C, 2018. 82: p. 130-140.
    21. Pahlevanzadeh, F., et al., Three-dimensional printing constructs based on the chitosan for tissue regeneration: State of the art, developing directions and prospect trends. Materials, 2020. 13(11): p. 2663.
    22. Skardal, A. and A. Atala, Biomaterials for integration with 3-D bioprinting. Annals of biomedical engineering, 2015. 43(3): p. 730-746.
    23. Dhawan, A., et al., Three-dimensional bioprinting for bone and cartilage restoration in orthopaedic surgery. JAAOS-Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 2019. 27(5): p. e215-e226.
    24. Yin, J., et al., 3D bioprinting of low-concentration cell-laden gelatin methacrylate (GelMA) bioinks with a two-step cross-linking strategy. ACS applied materials interfaces, 2018. 10(8): p. 6849-6857.
    25. Visscher, D.O., et al., Advances in bioprinting technologies for craniofacial reconstruction. Trends in biotechnology, 2016. 34(9): p. 700-710.
    26. Reyna-Urrutia, V., et al., 3D scaffolds of caprolactone/chitosan/polyvinyl alcohol/hydroxyapatite stabilized by physical bonds seeded with swine dental pulp stem cell for bone tissue engineering. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine, 2022. 33(12): p. 81.
    27. Kim, Y., et al., Chitosan-Based Biomaterials for Tissue Regeneration. Pharmaceutics, 2023. 15(3): p. 807.
    28. Rihayat, T. and N. Aidy. The role of poly (lactic acid)/chitosan nanocomposites blend in manufacture non-cytotoxic basic bio scaffold. in AIP Conference Proceedings. 2023. AIP Publishing.
    29. Macfarlane, E., M.J. Seibel, and H. Zhou, Arthritis and the role of endogenous glucocorticoids. Bone research, 2020. 8(1): p. 33.
    30. Huang, B.J., J.C. Hu, and K.A. Athanasiou, Cell-based tissue engineering strategies used in the clinical repair of articular cartilage. Biomaterials, 2016. 98: p. 1-22.
    31. Sadeghianmaryan, A., et al., Extrusion-based printing of chitosan scaffolds and their in vitro characterization for cartilage tissue engineering. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 2020. 164: p. 3179-3192.
    32. Yang, J., et al., In vitro and in vivo study on an injectable glycol chitosan/dibenzaldehyde-terminated polyethylene glycol hydrogel in repairing articular cartilage defects. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, 2021. 9: p. 607709.
    33. Boyer, C., et al., A self-setting hydrogel of silylated chitosan and cellulose for the repair of osteochondral defects: From in vitro characterization to preclinical evaluation in dogs. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, 2020. 8: p. 23.
    34. Nazhvani, F.D., et al., Effects of in vitro low oxygen tension preconditioning of buccal fat pad stem cells on in Vivo articular cartilage tissue repair. Life Sciences, 2021. 280: p. 119728.
    35. Luo, M., et al., A bionic composite hydrogel with dual regulatory functions for the osteochondral repair. Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces, 2022. 219: p. 112821.
    36. Li, P., et al., Chitosan hydrogel/3D-printed poly (ε‐caprolactone) hybrid scaffold containing synovial mesenchymal stem cells for cartilage regeneration based on tetrahedral framework nucleic acid recruitment. Biomaterials, 2021. 278: p. 121131.
    37. Houreh, A.B., E. Masaeli, and M.H. Nasr-Esfahani, Chitosan/polycaprolactone multilayer hydrogel: A sustained Kartogenin delivery model for cartilage regeneration. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 2021. 177: p. 589-600.
    38. Cui, Z.-K., et al., Microporous methacrylated glycol chitosan-montmorillonite nanocomposite hydrogel for bone tissue engineering. Nature communications, 2019. 10(1): p. 1-10.
    39. Jafari, H., et al., Magnetic κ-carrageenan/chitosan/montmorillonite nanocomposite hydrogels with controlled sunitinib release. Materials Science and Engineering: C, 2021. 124: p. 112042.
    40. Elhefian, E.A., M.M. Nasef, and A.H. Yahaya, Preparation and characterization of chitosan/agar blended films: part 2. Thermal, mechanical, and surface properties. E-Journal of Chemistry, 2012. 9(2): p. 510-516.
    41. Iqbal, D.N., et al., Synthesis and characterization of chitosan and guar gum based ternary blends with polyvinyl alcohol. International journal of biological macromolecules, 2020. 143: p. 546-554.
    42. Tonda-Turo, C., et al., Photocurable chitosan as bioink for cellularized therapies towards personalized scaffold architecture. Bioprinting, 2020. 18: p. e00082.
    43. Wang, W., et al., Chitosan derivatives and their application in biomedicine. International journal of molecular sciences, 2020. 21(2): p. 487.
    44. Bukzem, A.L., et al., Optimization of carboxymethyl chitosan synthesis using response surface methodology and desirability function. International journal of biological macromolecules, 2016. 85: p. 615-624.
    45. Bhatia, S.K. and K.W. Ramadurai, 3D printing and bio-based materials in global health. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing AG, 2017.
    46. Huang, G.-Q., et al., Preparation and characterization of O-carboxymethyl chitosan–sodium alginate polyelectrolyte complexes. Colloid and Polymer Science, 2015. 293(2): p. 401-407.
    47. Freitas, E.D., et al., An overview of current knowledge on the properties, synthesis and applications of quaternary chitosan derivatives. Polymers, 2020. 12(12): p. 2878.
    48. Andreica, B.-I., X. Cheng, and L. Marin, Quaternary ammonium salts of chitosan. A critical overview on the synthesis and properties generated by quaternization. European Polymer Journal, 2020. 139: p. 110016.
    49. Wahba, S.M., A.S. Darwish, and S.M. Kamal, Ceria-containing uncoated and coated hydroxyapatite-based galantamine nanocomposites for formidable treatment of Alzheimer''s disease in ovariectomized albino-rat model. Materials Science and Engineering: C, 2016. 65: p. 151-163.
    50. Federer, C., M. Kurpiers, and A. Bernkop-Schnu?rch, Thiolated chitosans: A multi-talented class of polymers for various applications. Biomacromolecules, 2020. 22(1): p. 24-56.
    51. Chen, T., et al., Biodegradable 3D printed HA/CMCS/PDA scaffold for repairing lacunar bone defect. Materials Science and Engineering: C, 2020. 116: p. 111148.
    52. Müller, W.E., et al., A new printable and durable N, O-carboxymethyl chitosan–Ca 2+–polyphosphate complex with morphogenetic activity. Journal of Materials Chemistry B, 2015. 3(8): p. 1722-1730.
    53. Yang, Y., et al., Anti-infective efficacy, cytocompatibility and biocompatibility of a 3D-printed osteoconductive composite scaffold functionalized with quaternized chitosan. Acta biomaterialia, 2016. 46: p. 112-128.
    54. Yang, Y., et al., Dual-functional 3D-printed composite scaffold for inhibiting bacterial infection and promoting bone regeneration in infected bone defect models. Acta biomaterialia, 2018. 79: p. 265-275.
    55. Kai, H., et al., Fabrication of a two-level tumor bone repair biomaterial based on a rapid prototyping technique. Biofabrication, 2009. 1(2): p. 025003.
    56. Chen, S., et al., Segmental composite porous scaffolds with either osteogenesis or anti‐bone resorption properties tested in a rabbit ulna defect model. Journal of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine, 2017. 11(1): p. 34-43.
    57. Lynn, A., I. Yannas, and W. Bonfield, Antigenicity and immunogenicity of collagen. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials: An Official Journal of The Society for Biomaterials, The Japanese Society for Biomaterials, and The Australian Society for Biomaterials and the Korean Society for Biomaterials, 2004. 71(2): p. 343-354.
    58. Olszta, M.J., et al., Bone structure and formation: A new perspective. Materials Science and Engineering: R: Reports, 2007. 58(3-5): p. 77-116.
    59. Xing, W. and Y. Tang, On mechanical properties of nanocomposite hydrogels: Searching for superior properties. Nano Materials Science, 2021.
    60. Hu, X., et al., 3D bio-printing of CS/Gel/HA/Gr hybrid osteochondral scaffolds. Polymers, 2019. 11(10): p. 1601.
    61. Serra, I., et al., Production and characterization of chitosan/gelatin/β-TCP scaffolds for improved bone tissue regeneration. Materials Science and Engineering: C, 2015. 55: p. 592-604.
    62. Wu, Q., et al., 3D printing of microstructured and stretchable chitosan hydrogel for guided cell growth. Advanced Biosystems, 2017. 1(6): p. 1700058.
    63. Wang, J., et al., Phage nanofibers induce vascularized osteogenesis in 3D printed bone scaffolds. Advanced materials, 2014. 26(29): p. 4961-4966.
    64. Timashev, P., et al., Novel biocompatible material based on solid-state modified chitosan for laser stereolithography. Современные технологии в медицине, 2015. 7(3 (eng)).
    65. Tsai, C.-H., et al., Improved bioactivity of 3D printed porous titanium alloy scaffold with chitosan/magnesium-calcium silicate composite for orthopaedic applications. Materials, 2019. 12(2): p. 203.
    66. Dadhich, P., et al., A simple approach for an eggshell-based 3D-printed osteoinductive multiphasic calcium phosphate scaffold. ACS applied materials interfaces, 2016. 8(19): p. 11910-11924.
    67. Chen, S., et al., Biomimetic synthesis of Mg‐substituted hydroxyapatite nanocomposites and three‐dimensional printing of composite scaffolds for bone regeneration. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A, 2019. 107(11): p. 2512-2521.
    68. Haberstroh, K., et al., Bone repair by cell‐seeded 3D‐bioplotted composite scaffolds made of collagen treated tricalciumphosphate or tricalciumphosphate‐chitosan‐collagen hydrogel or PLGA in ovine critical‐sized calvarial defects. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials, 2010. 93(2): p. 520-530.
    69. Yin, X., et al., IL-4-loaded alginate/chitosan multilayer films for promoting angiogenesis through both direct and indirect means. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 2023. 232: p. 123486.
    70. Su, F., et al., Biocompatibility and in vivo degradation of chitosan based hydrogels as potential drug carrier. Journal of Biomaterials Science, Polymer Edition, 2018. 29(13): p. 1515-1528.
    71. Suo, H., et al., Low-temperature 3D printing of collagen and chitosan composite for tissue engineering. Materials Science and Engineering: C, 2021. 123: p. 111963.
    72. Huang, J., et al., BMSCs-laden gelatin/sodium alginate/carboxymethyl chitosan hydrogel for 3D bioprinting. Rsc Advances, 2016. 6(110): p. 108423-108430.
    73. Vo, T.-S. and S.-K. Kim, Potential anti-HIV agents from marine resources: an overview. Marine drugs, 2010. 8(12): p. 2871-2892.
    74. Sukul, M., et al., In vitro biological response of human osteoblasts in 3D chitosan sponges with controlled degree of deacetylation and molecular weight. Carbohydrate Polymers, 2021. 254: p. 117434.
    75. Pan, H., et al., Hypolipidemic effects of chitosan and its derivatives in hyperlipidemic rats induced by a high-fat diet. Food nutrition research, 2016. 60(1): p. 31137.
    76. Patel, D.K., et al., 3D-printable chitosan/silk fibroin/cellulose nanoparticle scaffolds for bone regeneration via M2 macrophage polarization. Carbohydrate Polymers, 2022: p. 119077.
    77. Hu, J., et al., Vanillin-bioglass cross-linked 3D porous chitosan scaffolds with strong osteopromotive and antibacterial abilities for bone tissue engineering. Carbohydrate Polymers, 2021. 271: p. 118440.
    78. Ma, P., et al., Biomimetic gelatin/chitosan/polyvinyl alcohol/nano-hydroxyapatite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Materials Design, 2021: p. 109865.
    79. Maharjan, B., et al., Regenerated cellulose nanofiber reinforced chitosan hydrogel scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Carbohydrate Polymers, 2021. 251: p. 117023.
    80. Jiang, Z., et al., Construction of chitosan scaffolds with controllable microchannel for tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. Materials Science and Engineering: C, 2021. 126: p. 112178.
    81. Lee, C.-M., et al., Oxygen plasma treatment on 3D-printed chitosan/gelatin/hydroxyapatite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Journal of nanoscience and nanotechnology, 2017. 17(4): p. 2747-2750.
    82. Aydogdu, M.O., et al., Comparative characterization of the hydrogel added PLA/β-TCP scaffolds produced by 3D bioprinting. Bioprinting, 2019. 13: p. e00046.
    83. Ye, X., et al., Integrating 3D-printed PHBV/Calcium sulfate hemihydrate scaffold and chitosan hydrogel for enhanced osteogenic property. Carbohydrate polymers, 2018. 202: p. 106-114.
    84. Deng, N., et al., Experimental study of rhBMP-2 chitosan nano-sustained release carrier-loaded PLGA/nHA scaffolds to construct mandibular tissue-engineered bone. Archives of oral biology, 2019. 102: p. 16-25.
    85. Dong, L., et al., 3D-printed poly (ε-caprolactone) scaffold integrated with cell-laden chitosan hydrogels for bone tissue engineering. Scientific reports, 2017. 7(1): p. 1-9.
    86. Zhang, J., et al., Tissue engineering using 3D printed nano-bioactive glass loaded with NELL1 gene for repairing alveolar bone defects. Regenerative biomaterials, 2018. 5(4): p. 213-220.
    87. Lu, H., et al., Fabrication of graphene/gelatin/chitosan/tricalcium phosphate 3D printed scaffolds for bone tissue regeneration applications. Applied Nanoscience, 2021. 11(2): p. 335-346.
    88. Zafeiris, K., et al., Additive manufacturing of hydroxyapatite–chitosan–genipin composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering applications. Materials Science and Engineering: C, 2021. 119: p. 111639.
    89. Ergul, N.M., et al., 3D printing of chitosan/poly (vinyl alcohol) hydrogel containing synthesized hydroxyapatite scaffolds for hard-tissue engineering. Polymer Testing, 2019. 79: p. 106006.
    90. Wers, E., et al., Evaluation of the kinetic and relaxation time of gentamicin sulfate released from hybrid biomaterial Bioglass-chitosan scaffolds. Applied Surface Science, 2015. 353: p. 200-208.
    91. Shokri, S., et al., A new approach to fabrication of Cs/BG/CNT nanocomposite scaffold towards bone tissue engineering and evaluation of its properties. Applied Surface Science, 2015. 357: p. 1758-1764.
    92. Nazemi, K., et al., Tissue-engineered chitosan/bioactive glass bone scaffolds integrated with PLGA nanoparticles: a therapeutic design for on-demand drug delivery. Materials Letters, 2015. 138: p. 16-20.
    93. Puvaneswary, S., et al., Fabrication and in vitro biological activity of βTCP-Chitosan-Fucoidan composite for bone tissue engineering. Carbohydrate polymers, 2015. 134: p. 799-807.
    94. Reddy, N., et al., Alkali Treated 3D Chitosan Scaffolds with Enhanced Strength and Stability. Journal of Polymers and the Environment, 2021: p. 1-9.
    95. Kurian, M., R. Stevens, and K.M. McGrath, Towards the development of artificial bone grafts: combining synthetic biomineralisation with 3D printing. Journal of functional biomaterials, 2019. 10(1): p. 12.
    96. Shive, M.S., et al., BST-CarGel? treatment maintains cartilage repair superiority over microfracture at 5 years in a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Cartilage, 2015. 6(2): p. 62-72.
    97. Gholap, A.D., et al., Chitosan scaffolds: Expanding horizons in biomedical applications. Carbohydrate Polymers, 2023: p. 121394.
    引证文献
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

引文格式
Gurung Chetali, Nawaz Aamir, Udduttulla Anjaneyulu,等.壳聚糖:一种应用在三维骨组织工程中的生物活性支架材料 [J].集成技术,2025,14(2):86-108

Citing format
Gurung Chetali, Nawaz Aamir, Udduttulla Anjaneyulu, et al. Chitosan: A Scaffold Biomaterial in 3D Bone Tissue Engineering and Its Biological Activities[J]. Journal of Integration Technology,2025,14(2):86-108

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:537
  • 下载次数: 2856
  • HTML阅读次数: 0
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 收稿日期:2023-12-06
  • 最后修改日期:2023-12-06
  • 在线发布日期: 2024-05-08
文章二维码